Up to date: October 7, 2020 three:14:51 pm
Sushant Singh Rajput’s household wrote to the CBI on Wednesday alleging “unprofessional conduct” by AIIMS director Sudhir Gupta in leaking a forensic report of the late actor and sought a brand new panel for honest and correct evaluation of his loss of life.
The letter, despatched by means of advocate Varun Singh, claimed that the leaked report, if right, quantities to drawing a “biased and boastful” conclusion from inadequate proof.
“I’ve been studying within the media in regards to the report submitted by AIIMS to CBI with regard to the opinion expressed by CBI within the matter of the loss of life of Sushant Singh Rajput on the June 14, 2020. I’ve additionally seen some docs who had been a part of the AIIMS Staff come on TV and make statements with regard to the forensic examination accomplished by the crew,” Varun mentioned.
The letter, settled by Rajput’s household lawyer, senior advocate Vikas Singh, acknowledged that despite repeated efforts to get a replica of the report, there was no response by Gupta.
The household has objected to the AIIMS report saying that Gupta-headed forensic crew was not submitting a autopsy report however was solely to expressing its opinion on the findings of Cooper Hospital in Mumbai.
“Gupta has been giving media interviews in regards to the delicate case proper from day one, questioning the Medical doctors of Cooper Hospital for doubtful post-mortem and Maharashtra Police for hurried autopsy and contamination and non-preservation of scene of crime,” the letter mentioned, including that there have been a number of infirmities within the autopsy report accomplished on the Cooper Hospital.
Pointing infirmities, the letter mentioned the autopsy was accomplished at night time with out there being any order of the Justice of the Peace and the protocol was not adopted as opined by a number of consultants of forensic departments from all around the world.
“The videography of the autopsy was not accomplished. Enough viscera was not retained for future examination. The time of the loss of life was not talked about within the autopsy report. The accidents on the physique weren’t specified and thus there was no opinion expressed of the reason for such accidents.
“The leg which was fractured was not talked about within the report. There have been a number of different infirmities which could possibly be identified by a real forensic examination however by some means the identical have been overlooked by the AIIMS crew as expressed by one of many docs in his interview telecast by a TV channel,” the letter alleged.
It contended that Gupta just lately bought the incriminating content material of the report, submitted to the CBI, leaked selectively to a few media homes, and irresponsibly commenting that the loss of life of Sushant is “conclusively” a case of suicide and there’s no foul play.
“Clearly the mentioned leak is aimed toward creating doubts within the thoughts of individuals, bailing out companies who haven’t accomplished their job as per guidelines and normal protocols, benefitting the culprits and derailing the course of ongoing investigation.
“The conduct of Dr Sudhir Gupta is unethical, unprofessional, in contravention of presidency service conduct guidelines and MCI tips. This legal misadventure on his half has undermined public belief in a premier establishment like AIIMS. It has created doubts within the minds of hundreds of thousands of individuals in regards to the equity of investigation,” the letter mentioned.
It mentioned the forensic crew of AIIMS has not given a categorical opinion on the issues of the autopsy accomplished on the Cooper Hospital and have given a report which they weren’t speculated to do.
Due to this fact, the matter must be referred to a different forensic crew to be constituted by CBI by choosing up a few of the finest names within the discipline from completely different hospital so honest and correct evaluation takes place, the letter mentioned.
The AIIMS report, if in any respect, might have solely specified the reason for loss of life i.e. by hanging and couldn’t have gone to say that it’s a case of suicide as a result of that’s one thing which solely the CBI can determine after a whole investigation within the matter.
The letter mentioned that CBI can also inquire into the circumstances that led Gupta to bask in such unprofessional conduct that threatens to jeopardise the course of investigation and assist wrong-doers escape the clutches of legislation.
The AIIMS medical board has dominated out homicide within the loss of life of Rajput and termed it “a case of hanging and loss of life by suicide,” the premier institute’s forensic chief Gupta mentioned on Saturday.
Rajput, 34, who made his silver display debut within the critically acclaimed ”Kai Po Che” seven years in the past, was discovered useless in his condominium in suburban Bandra in Mumbai on June 14.
The CBI had taken over the probe from Bihar Police into the alleged abetment to suicide case filed by the actor’s father Ok Ok Singh in Patna in opposition to Rajput’s girlfriend Rhea Chakraborty and her household.
📣 The Indian Categorical is now on Telegram. Click on right here to affix our channel (@indianexpress) and keep up to date with the newest headlines