Would have sacked military chief if Kargil warfare was carried out with out informing me: Imran Khan : The Tribune India

Islamabad, October 2

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan has mentioned that he would have sacked the Military Chief had the Kargil warfare with India been began with out informing him.

Nawaz Sharif, who was the prime minister throughout the Kargil warfare, has lengthy maintained that he was not conscious of what was taking place when the battle broke out in 1999. He says the then military chief Gen Pervez Musharraf had attacked Kargil with out informing him.

“I’d have sacked the military chief if Kargil operation was carried out with out informing me,” Khan mentioned in an interview to personal information channel Samaa TV on Thursday.

Khan additionally mentioned that he would sack the Inter-Providers Intelligence (ISI) chief if the latter requested him to resign. The remark was made within the context of three-time prime minister Sharif’s declare that the ISI chief requested him to step down in 2014 when Khan had unleashed a giant protest sit-in the nationwide capital.

He mentioned the military was protecting the nation united and slammed Sharif for concentrating on the navy institution.

“Have a look at Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen; the whole Muslim world is ablaze [so] why are we secure? If it weren’t for our military, our nation would’ve been in three items…” Khan mentioned.

Sharif not too long ago made two speeches from London, the place he has been staying since November 2019 on medical grounds, immediately attacking the military for interference in politics and claimed that Khan got here to energy by means of its help.

The highly effective Military, which has dominated Pakistan for greater than half of its 70 plus years of existence, has hitherto wielded appreciable energy within the issues of safety and international coverage.

Khan additionally mentioned that it was not the military’s job to run the federal government and failure of a democratically elected authorities shouldn’t be used to impose a martial legislation.

“If a decide offers a flawed determination it means the judiciary has to evolve. The military has developed as nicely. Up to date civil-military relations are the most effective in historical past as a result of they’re all working of their spheres,” he mentioned.

He additionally claimed that the military was standing by the federal government in all issues together with relations with India, opening of the Kartarpur Hall and the coronavirus pandemic. PTI

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a comment
scroll to top